IDAHOBIT* with The Love Tank

Participants could live, work or socialise in Tower Hamlets to contribute to the council’s ‘needs assessment’, meaning, if you’ve ever bought a matcha latte on Brick Lane, your opinion was as good as any. There were 25 research participants in total, 22 of whom attended a dinner party, with three additional interviewees outside of that setting. Sixty-eight percent identified as non-white and 80 percent as disabled (aka ‘neurodivergent’).

Juno Dawson gives a lecture on children’s literature

Okay, my first complaint is that Dawson claimed to have only written the speech the day before. No, just no. No, you did not write your fucking speech only the day before, Dawson. Not possible. What a lie! Second complaint – okay, not really a complaint, more just noting how utterly predictable a TIM is – an ill-judged joke (for that audience) about lubricant. Dear reader, we were just two minutes in.

Documentary review: Heightened Scrutiny

Beginning with portentous music and court scenes, Heightened Scrutiny follows the story of pip-squeak lawyer, Chase Strangio, a trans-identified female working for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), as she attempts to persuade the courts – and us – that GnRH agonists are, in fact, life saving healthcare for pre- and -pubescent children. A vast array of talking heads are employed throughout, who are mostly media persons, all onside the trans activist narrative. The main message: Bodily autonomy, first. Of course, the nebulous-sounding ‘trans bodies’ are under attack and the threat of violence and suicide ever present.

Lecture on Gender, Sex and the Law, a UCL Law Event

Shaz was there at the beginning of it all, i.e. the 2004 Gender Recognition Act (GRA). There had been a Telegraph article titled: Gender is no substitute for sex. (In fact, the article is no such thing, rather a jokey piece written by the Telegraph’s sketch writer, worth reading, especially for a dig at a young David Lammy, being unsure about sexual reproductive anatomy.) Anyway, Shaz appeared to think it a monumental article on the GRA, and although it’s true that the proposed bill slipped under the radar at the time, surely she could have a found a more serious (?feminist) critique to direct law students to?

1 2 3 41